双城记读书感悟100字6篇

时间：2022-05-15 12:55:01 来源：网友投稿

双城记读书感悟100字6篇

双城记读书感悟100字篇1

《双城记》是狄更斯最重要的代表作之一。早在创作《双城记》之前很久，狄更斯就对法国大革命极为关注，反复研读英国历史学家卡莱尔的《法国革命史》和其他学者的有关着作。他对法国大革命的浓厚兴趣发端于对当时英国潜伏着的严重的社会危机的担忧。1854年底，他说：“我相信，不满情绪像这样冒烟比火烧起来还要坏得多，这特别像法国在第一次革命爆发前的公众心理，这就有危险，由于千百种原因——如收成不好、贵族阶级的专横与无能把已经紧张的局面最后一次加紧、海外战争的失利、国内偶发事件等等——变成那次从未见过的一场可怕的大火。”可见，《双城记》这部历史小说的创作动机在于借古讽今，以法国大革命的历史经验为借鉴，给英国统治阶级敲响警钟;同时，通过对革命恐怖的极端描写，也对心怀愤懑、希图以暴力对抗暴政的人民群众提出警告，幻想为社会矛盾日益加深的英国现状寻找一条出路。

从这个目的出发，小说深刻地揭露了法国大革命前深深激化了的社会矛盾，强烈地抨击贵族阶级的荒淫残暴，并深切地同情下层人民的苦难。作品尖锐地指出，人民群众的忍耐是有限度的，在贵族阶级的残暴统治下，人民群众迫于生计，必然奋起反抗。这种反抗是正义的。小说还描绘了起义人民攻击巴士底狱等壮观场景，表现了人民群众的伟大力量。然而，作者站在资产阶级人道主义的立场上，即反对残酷压迫人民的暴政，也反对革命人民反抗暴政的暴力。在狄更斯笔下，整个革命被描写成一场毁灭一切的巨大灾难，它无情地惩罚罪恶的贵族阶级，也盲目地杀害无辜的人们。

双城记读书感悟100字篇2

《双城记》是英国作家查尔斯·狄更斯以法国大革命为背景写的一篇小说，它是发生在巴黎和伦敦两个城市之间的故事，所以叫双城记，下面介绍主要人物及关系：

马柰特大夫：故事主人公马奈特大夫初次登场，即已是一具白发苍苍，形容枯槁的活尸，一台只会埋头做鞋的机器，完全丧失了理智和感情。他给人从狱中搭救出来，“死”而复生，逃离曾经那样亏待他的法国。五年之后，已经在伦敦僻静的街角安居乐业，往时遭受迫害的阴影仍频频进逼，骚扰他的梦境。

露茜·马奈特：马奈特医生的女儿，娇小轻盈的漂亮身材，一头丰厚的金发，一双和银行的劳瑞先生的目光相遇时带着询问神情的蓝眼睛，一个具有幼嫩光滑的奇特功能的前额。后和夏尔·达柰结婚。

夏尔·达柰：发育良好，模样端庄，面庞饱受日晒，是一副年轻上等人的派头，他的叔叔埃弗瑞蒙德侯爵曾凭御赐空白捕票断送了马奈特大夫的前半生。

德发日夫妇：巴黎圣安东区一家酒铺的老板，曾是马奈特医生的旧仆。他的酒铺是革命团体秘密联络的据点，但是对太太欲将马奈特大夫一家斩尽杀绝的密谋，他并未染指。

西德尼卡顿：利用貌似达奈的条件，李代桃僵，打破了德发日太太的疯狂的复仇计划。

为了深爱的露茜，代替她的丈夫上了断头台。

双城记读书感悟100字篇3

A Love and Hate in A Tale of Two Cities Many have grown fond of the taleinvolving the noble， former Fr ench aristocrat， who had virtually unmatched(except maybe in boo ks) good fortune。 First， his life was saved by the pitifultestimony of a beautiful young woman。 Anyone would gladly have married th isbeautiful too-good-to-be-true-woman he wedded。 It is later seen， however， thatthis man should have married her even if she were u gly as sin。 This was not thecase though， and he married a beautif ul woman， who had an admirer who was adead ringer for her hus band， was a loser， and would give his life to keep herfrom pain， all of which really es in handy when her hubby is on his way to theguillotine。 This is not the story of a man with multiple gua rdian angels， butrather that of a character in Charles Dickens" nove l A Tale of Two Cities。 Askeptic could easily see this as an unbe lievable， idealistic and overratednovel that is too far-fetched。 An u nbiased reader， however， can see

that this is a story of love and ha te， each making up the bare-bones ofthe novel so that one must l ook closely to see Dickens" biases， attempts atpersuasion， and unbe lievable plot-lines， some of which are spawned fromDickens" love and hate， and some of which love and hate are used to develop。

The more lifeless of the characters we are supposed to like--the Ma nettes，Darnay， Lorry-- play their parts in the idyllic fashion Dicken s and like-mindedreaders want， a fashion made inflexible by circu mstances and purposes。"Circumstances and purposes" refers in larg e part to Dickens" state of mind andobjective。 Dickens" intrusive， u nusually editorial point of view， withreferences to "I" and deviatio ns from narration for monologue， reveals thenovel"s slavery to the teachings of his morals--or perhaps his own slavery tothe morals o f his time and Protestantism。 Therefore， can Lucie be any differentfrom the supportive， wholly feminine wife and mother she is? Not if Dickens" isto stick to his obligation， or perhaps obstinate purpos e， of moral teachings。With that aside， what is to be said of Dickens" teaching， his presen tation oflove and hate? They both have one thing in mon: the characters representing eachare unmistakable at a mile away。 The moment Lucie Manette is put before

the reader"s eyes， her tumblin g blond locks， her bright blue eyes， herseventeen-year-old， slight， p retty (but not sexy!) figure and all， he knowsthat， not only will sh e not be a villainous， unlikable character， but she willbe the epito me of the good， beautiful woman (and later housewife)， the one Dickens thought every women should be。 At this young woman"s intr oduction withMr。 Lorry， she curtseys to him， and Dickens wastes

no time in pointing out that "young ladies made curtseys in those days"。The introductory scene climaxes at fair Lucie"s fainting， one that， to some，puts her unflawed position into question， although to Dickens， it reinforces it。At the other side of this moral lecture are the Defarges。 Call Dicke ns a masterfor embodying qualities， but here are another flawless pair--flawlessly evil，and sentenced to evil from the moment we see Madame Defarge"s "watchful eye thatseldom seemed to look at a nything， a large hand heavily ringed， a steady face，strong features， and great posure of manner"， a stark contrast to the slight，fai nting figure of Mada-- or rather， Miss Manette。 To further turn us againstgood old Madame Defarge， Dickens has her using a toothpi ck publicly in heropening scene， an activity dainty Miss Manette wouldn"t dream of。 Finally， wemustn"t forget the setting。 Lucie ma y have been born in France， but shedefected to England， and trave led from London to meet Mr。 Lorr

y。 Madame Defarge was a Frenc hwoman， born and living amongst peasants whodrank wine scoope d off of mud。 She probably was not taught Dickens" (and hisprima ry English audience"s) Protestant morals in her Catholic nation， andcertainly did not manifest them。

In arguably the book"s first touching scene (some say it"s the one whereCarton is on his way to the guillotine)， Lucie goes through much trouble to coaxher father from his insanity， laying her head on his shoulder， and trusting aman she had never met。 When Mad ame Defarge sought vengeance for the cruelinjustice mitted ag ainst her kin， she looked to destroy not only the innocentdescende nt of the culprit， but his family-- an old man， a young woman， an d alittle girl。 These two characters" love and hate are unconditional and total。Did this have to be so? Could not Madame Defarge ha ve showed one bit offemininity， of human kindness? Could Lucie not have stolen a contemptuous glanceat her persecutors? Not with Dickens at the helm。 Lucie and Defarge are createdwith a convic tion， and once Dickens" plot was laid， the blinders he put on hisc haracters allowed only one route。 Perhaps it was a primitive style， but moderncharacters are painted more realistically， with human w eaknesses and

more variability。 Did it have to be so? Could Dicken s have captured morereaders， especially in the long run， if he had pursued more varying actions inhis characters， as well as more h umanness and believability? Does this point toDickens as a flawed writer， with little imagination and ability? Another factorthat must be considered is our inability to criticize a n English--orEnglish-living--character， or to find a modicum of res

pectability in a French one， with two exceptions。 One is the young womanwho is beheaded just before Sydney Carton。 She is the en emy of an enemy， she isgoing to be killed， and she allows Dicke ns to teach another moral using SydneyCarton。 Why not have her happy to die for the benefit of her countrymen， whilenot trembling as she ascends to her death， thereby depriving the mon enemy of asmall victory? With the modern trend of political correctness and anti-racism， aTale of Two Cities written today would never le ave the word processor。 JerryCruncher is about the most sinful of the English (aside from a spy but，remember， he defected to Franc e)， and he repents by the end， which counts foranother moral fro m Dickens。 In Dickens" time， racism was not regarded as it istoda y， and so if he wanted to use the French Revolution to send a me ssage tothe population， it was his right， but he may have taken thi s too far for some。Today， Lucie Manette would by no means be taken seriously as

a believable， even likable character。 She persists in fainting at particularly stressful moments， but when her husband is before a heartless， bloodthirstyjury， she looks brave and strong just for him。 In cont ext， this was a screamingcontradiction， but one that Dickens requir ed to portray his Eve。 It is mucheasier to believe Madame Defarg e"s hate than her opposition"s love。 Defarge"ssister was raped and

murdered mercilessly and her brother was killed by a pair heartless"noblemen"。 It is much easier to understand Defarge"s taste for blo od than thecondition of Manette， who， after practicing as a pet ent doctor and actingnormally for years， experiences a recurrence of his mental condition simplybecause his wonderful daughter has left for two weeks， although he has two dearfriends nearby。 Charles Dickens has built an enduring story enjoyed by millions，w hich is loved by experts and critics today although it would be im mediatelybutchered if written by a modern author。 It is a love stor y loved by itscreator， but wholly unbelievable。 It is actually doom ed by its own idealism andunrealistic characters。 As a hate story， i t is much more petent， although alsousing this for its own pur poses。 One can draw one"s own conclusions and ideasfrom such a book， but facts are facts。

双城记读书感悟100字篇4

这是一个以两百多年前的两个伟大的城市为背景的故事。浓雾弥漫，车灯摇曳不定的伦敦，绝望、颓废的巴黎的最底层。

对于当时那场发生在巴黎的轰轰烈烈的大革命，太多人花了太多的笔墨去描述它。这对法国来说是一场具有重大意义的转变，甚至对于欧洲，对于整个世界来说也是如此。作者狄更斯，是英国最杰出的现实主义批判作家之一。虽然他没有亲眼目睹，却依靠自己丰富的想象力看到的当时的景象。

《双城记》被誉为描写法国大革命的最杰出的代表作，我想的原因可能是因为它的与众不同。和其他的作品，比如卡莱尔的《法国大革命》不同，狄更斯更注重的是底层人民的喜怒哀乐。尽管在那个时代，这些小人物本身并不能引起世界的关注。但是作者敏锐的捕捉到这些小人物和大革命有着千丝万缕的联系，可以说法国大革命本身就是有小人物们的力量所引发的。

双城记读书感悟100字篇5

“复活在我，生命在我，信我的人，虽然死了，也必复活;凡活着信我的人，必永远不死。”

这是一个不幸的年代，作品以法国大革命为背景，反映了封建贵族对人们的迫害，以及法国大革命的欺压，整部故事情节围绕马奈特医生一家展开描述，其中查尔斯·达内便是法国大革命的受害者，他是一名自愿放弃贵族生活，希望独自在社会上找到地位立足的人，不料，却被指控为逃亡贵族，不幸的他即将被送上断头台，而这时，意想不到的事发生了······

当时，法国人民攻破了巴士底狱，并开始疯狂地惩罚压迫者，这便是著名的法国大革命，他们以德日法夫妇为首，不分青红皂白地把人送上断头台，多么荒唐，只为达成他们每天所订的人头个数。于是，他们便渴望能够让达内为他们增添一个人头，达内有一位兄弟：卡顿，他是一位自甘堕落的律师，他得了绝症，于是便恍恍惚惚地苦熬着剩余的时光，他的哥哥达内常常欺辱他、排斥他，甚至不将卡顿当人看，但就在达内被判下死刑的那一天，只有卡顿来看了他，卡顿迷昏了达内，并用自己改装替代了他，让达内终于逃脱了一死，而自己，却在第二天失去了生命。

这就是爱，朴实，真诚，在兄弟之间，没有你我，你的生命，就是我的生命，爱是互相的，并不需要过多的语言去表达，只需要用行动去证明。在一起生活的兄弟，有时会耍耍脾气，但永远都无法堵上他们心灵之间的那条通道，它是兄弟的见证，爱的奇迹。

在双城记中，作者用大量的笔墨描写了人民的抗争，这也是狄更斯所要揭露的——美与丑，美与丑是相互对应的，但它们却绝非任何人都能分辨出来，“人不可貌相，海水不可斗量。”我们要正确认识到自己或别人的缺陷，并且进行反思、改正，同时，认真地发现周围所有美的事物，用心灵去感受他们。不要被表面所迷惑，更应该做一个正直、善良的人。

双城记读书感悟100字篇6

合上这本书，我觉得银行家罗瑞和律师卡顿有太多的相似之处，他们俩其实是惺惺相惜的，只不过卡顿隐藏的更深，直到最后，罗瑞才发现卡顿是个有感情的人，可是其实自始至终，卡顿一直就看穿了罗瑞那压抑的情感，因为他自也是这样一样将感情深深隐藏起来的人，所以他很能看懂罗瑞的心思。也正因为这样，卡顿才能觉察这个一向以“办公事”自居的银行家的感伤。故事刚开始时，卡顿就漫不经心的、毫不客气的戳中了罗瑞矛盾的内心，当时罗瑞对他的表现是气愤的，而当故事快结束时，他以真挚的口吻揭露公事公办的人又有私情流露时，罗瑞感到的是意外，他看到了卡顿的另外一面，或者是卡顿本来的样子。正因为惺惺相惜，卡顿最终才把转移露西的计划托付给了罗瑞，因为他们都是靠谱的人。

我们都是有才华、感情深厚的人，请不要因为一时的不如意，而消沉了自己的意志，也不要沉迷虚幻，给自己戴上假面;我们应该像卡顿一样找到自己的光明，为之奋斗。我们也曾态度满不在乎，也曾懒散轻蔑，也曾彷徨漂泊，也曾走投无路，但我们不能因此而沉沦，如果你沉沦了这将是最糟糕的时代，如果你为着光明儿奋斗，用才华和情感获取幸福，这将是最美好的时代!